Think AI could help your business but not sure where to start? In the first call, we'll map what makes sense, what doesn't, and what the realistic next step is.
I usually respond within 24 hours.
I help companies deploy AI into production — without chaos, unnecessary costs, or dead ends.
Whether you want faster customer communication, better lead handling, or less manual work for your team, I help you choose the right approach and put it into practice.
I combine CTO-level engineering leadership with extensive experience in customer-facing work, international deployments, hiring, and operations.
Location: Prague / Online
Problems I solve best — because I've solved them before, at scale.
Output:
- where AI can bring the biggest value
- what to tackle first
- how to do it safely and practically
- how you'll know it's working
Output:
- first usable version in real workflows
- quality and error control
- cost monitoring
- clear boundaries for what AI should and should not do
Output:
- clearer technical decisions
- lower risk of bad investments
- support with hiring choices
- stronger development workflow
Transparency: I'm a co-founder/ex-CTO of GoodVision, so I'll always disclose any potential conflict and suggest alternatives when appropriate. If an existing product is a better fit than custom development, I'll say so openly.
In the first call, we'll identify where AI can truly help your business — and where it would just waste money.
Not every company needs a fully autonomous agent. I'll help you take the right next step — and recognize when it's time to stop.
Humans do everything by hand — from looking up information through drafting replies to making the final call.
The model drafts replies and looks up information. A human reads, checks, and approves everything — AI is a fast helper, not a decision-maker.
The model strictly follows clear steps defined for your process. A human always approves at the end — no surprises.
The agent picks where to look for information and which tools to use. It hands a finished package to a human for review and final approval.
The agent has authority to make smaller decisions on its own. Larger decisions and unclear situations get escalated to a human — the rules define exactly where the line is.
Every company is different — and so is the right level of AI.
Some get the most value from an AI assistant, others need an agent with tools or a partially autonomous system. I'll help you identify the right level for you and design a solution at the scope that fits.
Anonymized examples from real projects.
Context: Law firm receiving new inquiries from multiple channels — often incomplete, senior staff spending time on initial evaluation.
Problem: Poorly framed questions or insensitive communication drive clients away. Key information is missing for initial assessment.
What we delivered: The assistant asks clients for key details, prepares a short summary, and passes lawyers only what is worth handling.
Result: Less time spent on first-pass sorting, less repetitive rewriting, and faster responses to new prospects.
Safety: Sensitive data minimization, audit log, role-based access, escalation to a human when uncertain
Context: B2B2C model in commodities — many suppliers, many customers, many steps. Users don't want to onboard to another tool.
Problem: Coordination chaos, inconsistent supplier data, communication delays.
What we delivered: The system guides people step by step in familiar channels, collects key information, and reduces manual coordination.
Result: Significantly faster turnaround from inquiry to supplier selection. Less manual coordination, higher conversion through familiar channels.
Safety: Input validation, clear rules for customer vs. supplier communication, auditable process
Context: Benefits comparison tool — users have many preferences but can't translate them into decisions. A data table isn't enough.
Problem: Users see the data but don't know what it means for them. A personalized perspective is missing.
What we delivered: AI helps users understand what matters for them and translates complex data into everyday language.
Result: Higher clarity and user confidence. Better engagement — more completed comparisons and higher conversion.
Quality: Continuous tuning on real data and feedback, transparent recommendation explanations
Context: GoodVision needed real-time video analysis across multiple locations, serving customers in >100 countries.
Problem: Processing 1000+ camera streams with sub-second latency, scaling to handle peak loads, maintaining 99.9% uptime.
What I did: Designed edge processing architecture running on NVIDIA Jetson devices, built model serving infrastructure achieving 99%+ detection accuracy, implemented MLOps pipeline for continuous deployment, optimized for GPU economics and edge deployment.
Business result: Reliable production operation under high load, sub-second latency in selected scenarios, and meaningful reduction in operating costs.
Stack: AWS, AWS IoT, Docker, NVIDIA Jetson, Jetpack, PyTorch, TensorRT
Context: ML workload requiring significant GPU compute with cost and latency constraints.
Problem: Balancing GPU costs, latency requirements, and scalability for variable workloads.
What I did: Architected hybrid cloud solution (on-demand + spot instances), implemented auto-scaling, optimized model inference, established cost monitoring and alerting.
Business result: Significant cost reduction while maintaining required latency and stable operations during substantial traffic spikes.
Stack: AWS EC2, ECS, CloudWatch, custom cost optimization
Context: Needed to scale engineering from founding team to support growth across >100 countries.
Problem: Hiring quality engineers, establishing technical culture, building processes for distributed team, maintaining delivery speed.
What I did: Built hiring process and technical interviews, established architecture principles, implemented CI/CD and code review practices, created onboarding system, set up cross-functional collaboration.
Business result: More stable delivery across time zones, faster release throughput, and systematic technical debt control.
Stack: Hiring processes, technical culture, architecture governance, CI/CD, cross-functional processes
I help identify where AI makes business sense and follow through all the way to live operations.
I design systems to stay reliable, handle growth, and avoid unnecessary operating costs.
I have experience with demanding AI systems that must be fast and reliable in real-world conditions.
Over the last several years, more than 50% of my work has been customer-facing and operational. Alongside leading engineering, product, and AI development, I represented the company in international business negotiations, supervised real-world deployments, organized trade fair participation and executive presentations, hired technical and marketing talent, and managed operational topics such as office selection, planning, and day-to-day company operations.
This combination allows me to connect board-level business priorities with practical technical delivery — from first customer conversation to production rollout.
I deliver the most value where business, product, and architecture need to be aligned. Still not sure? Book a free 30-min call — no commitment, we'll figure out if it's a fit.
Currently accepting select engagements. Let's discuss your architecture and a practical plan for the next steps.
Think AI could help your business but not sure where to start? In the first call, we'll map what makes sense, what doesn't, and what the realistic next step is.
I usually respond within 24 hours.